From Each According To His Means, To Each According To Political Advantage...

From Ya-Hoooooooo Hoo Hoo!! News...

We Are All in It Together, Clinton Says

(Socialist) Presidential hopeful Hillary Rodham Clinton outlined a broad economic vision Tuesday, saying it's time to replace an "on your own" society with one based on shared responsibility and prosperity.

The Democratic senator said what the Bush administration touts as an ownership society really is an "on your own" society that has widened the gap between rich and poor.

"I prefer a 'we're all in it together' society," she said. "I believe our government can once again work for all Americans. It can promote the great American tradition of opportunity for all and special privileges for none." (Except for her, and the other Socialist Elites who know what is best for you.)

Okay, first of all, how many of you believe that in a "we're all in this together" society, that Hillary Rodham Rodham will be "in it" with YOU?

And second, her spelling is off. It isn't an "ON your own" society that seeks to abolish, it is an "OWN your own" society.

Hillary Clinton does not believe that YOU have any right to what you earn. She does not believe that you have any right to be as rich as she and John Edwards are, and she has announced her intention to prevent you from ever having the chance to get that way.

But I haven't noticed her giving her own money away, or Edwards either for that matter.

She wants to give YOUR money away.

Have you ever had a friend, brother, brother-in-law, etc, who was perpetually down on his luck and never had any money, but out of the goodness of your heart, you decided to loan him a thousand dollars, let him sleep on your couch, help him buy a car... whatever?

Most all of us have...

Now... Did it end well? Or were you eventually put into a position in which you were forced make a decision to either treat him cruelly and throw him out into the cold, or let him drag you into the poor-house with him?

Which did you choose? Which WOULD you choose?

Hillary Clinton wants to make charity from YOUR wallet National Policy, and on a much larger scale than the already failing Socialist Security Program or the obscene, inneffective and immoral "War on Poverty."

And her mention of "fairness" and "the free market" within the context of her ideaology makes about as much sense as a screen door on a Submarime. (But then again, even THAT would at least keep the fish out...)

It's laughable.

She is perhaps the most dangerous person in America...

No, I take that back.

The people who are stupid enough to even consider voting for her for ANY Elected Office are the most dangerous people in America.

She is just ridiculous.

But then again, maybe a season or two in the National Hell she would create in America, should she ever be given any real power, is exactly what America needs right now.

It would sour all thinking Americans on anything that even slightly smells of Socialism for centuries...

More on this later... Stay tuned.